Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd argue that mixing several simple technologies is usually simpler than > having a single monolithic complicated one. I'd bet that all of my > lighttpd.conf files concatenated together aren't as long as the default > httpd.conf that Apache ships with ;-) Don't get me wrong: Apache does *do* > more things than Lighttpd, however, I find that most of those things aren't > things that are used in 80% of environments.
Oh, I'm not testing you! Sorry if this was your impression. I'm really trying to optimize things here and use my client's resources better. :-) Thanks for your answers. I've marked them as unexpirable here and I'll give Pound and Lighttpd a try. :-) -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
