On 1/18/06, Karl Guertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/18/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You might hold off on that for the moment. I'd really like to think > > about how stateful widgets would work, and there might be some > > breaking changes as a result. (I don't *want* to make breaking changes > > per se, but too many people get tripped up by this.) > > If we're doing breaking changes, let me know how we're handling the > declarative issue in #114. If we're going to do widgetmeta or name the > fields with a leading underscore, that will be a breaking change, > which is why I haven't done it.
I'll send a message with a proposal before doing anything. There are enough people who have been playing with widgets at this point that there will likely be more informed opinions available than there were when I was starting out with them. Kevin
