Man, my notes on these changes were awful. As noted below, the widget is no longer in the namespace of the template. What I didn't mention is that I simplified a lot of the variable names. Since these templates are very special purpose and just for widgets, things like "widget_value" just became "value". At this point, using simpler names seemed to make sense, and it didn't seem to me that name collisions were going to be a giant problem.
Kevin On 2/2/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another thing: the widget itself is no longer automatically provided > to the template namespace. This encourages two things: > > 1) threadsafe use (since you can't just dump things in the widget and > grab them from the template) > > 2) moving more computation to the Python code (since you'll likely > need to create an update_data method to give data to the template > anyhow)
