Kevin Dangoor wrote: > On 3/29/06, Claudio MartÃnez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just submitted ticket with a patch attached. >> >> http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/ticket/694/ >> >> """Unexpected keyword arguments never get to a controller or validator >> because they are cleared in the way by adapt_call. This function only >> leaves the parameters used by the controller. >> >> This can cause many problems, for example if your controller has an >> optional keyword argument called limit and someone somewhere mistypes >> limit as linit, you would be using the default value. Depending on the >> situation, this can cost a lot of time. > > I think you're right that this can make troubleshooting more > difficult. This behavior in the controller is fairly new. Rather than > just going ahead and adding a switch, it'd be good to discuss whether > people want this kind of behavior. > > I'm pretty sure that Simon and I talked about it a little bit when he > implemented that code, but it's an important enough point to bring up > with the group here. > > Should unexpected parameters raise an exception every time?
The idea was we should not allow something as simple as an incomplete link resulting in errors (500). Having said that, I agree with Claudio, making this behaviour optional can save time during development. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
