Thanks - interesting notes. I assume any comparisons made to c# mean
you actually know c# - don't take that the wrong way,
yes I do although I like it's original implementation by Sun more. :D
C# is a good languaje the problems that ASP.NET is, don't get me wrong is 100times better then plan ASP but it still doesn't beats TG in reusability, and easy of use.
I don't know enough about Python to make any comparisions but also, at the end of
the day I'm not looking to reduce lines of code.
I agree in part, reducing the lines count isn't the goal, but it help a lot, I pointed that out in the way that less code = less memory usage.
I'm looking for stability and speed (of JIT compiling) and runtime code. (want to kill
a well hung machine, start up 4x apps with 5000 code files at the same
time)
agains it's apache and you should know that apache is better then IIS.
On the other hand Java's JIT, I'm sorry .net JIT is not needed in python since "everything" runs in JIT, that's why python not a compiled languaje.
But MS IL, bytecode and pyc are just all flavors of the same idea, you have this "platform independant ASM-like languaje" that is transform by a runtime, VM , interperter to real machine code. which is faster? I don't know we'll have to ask the benchmarks but I believe python has an advantage or more potential for it since everything is interpreted so none of the people "building the core" have to "waste" time doing compilers.
I'd like to know more SQLObject(s?) - off the bat I'd be really nervous
having no control over my sql statements - I like to split my data
between databases ... why, cause I'm freaking nuts but seriously when
you have db's over 800Gigs then having code that uses different db's
for different things is great, it allows me to split my 800G into 4x
200G databases with a db layer that knows how to fetch everything. I
actually have 1 file called my command file, its a single class, all
static methods - every single sql statement is here. The command class
uses a static db class to make disconnected db calls.
see Kevin's comment above I'll go with sa too, for flexibility of SQL.
SQLObject is a ORM, SQLAlchemy is a database abstraction layer and a ORM, the diference is that to manage the sql code in SQLObject you will probably have to mess with it's internals.
So in c# I use datasets, I like 'em - I strongly type them (lazily)
when I need. I assume a SQLObject (actually I know) its strongly typed
but can you override with your own sql? What is the preferred method of
db access if you don't use the TG way but are using TG?
so far there is nothing like datasets on TG, and sorry to disagree I hope that never becomes the std. I hate them they abstract too many from you and you waste tpp much time trying to make them do this or that, so you end up implementing your own.
the closes CRUD TG has is call FastData? (it's under projects in the svn) but it's still in its infancy.
Thanks again
sure np :)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
