On 8/28/06, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Besides the fact that this is not so much a TG but a python matter - I suggest > you start looking into ZODB. That is an existing, powerful OO-db that allows > you to store objects without the need for any schema definition whatsoever. > > Providing a TG backend for that would IMHO be a much worthier goal.
I was going to suggest the same thing but for Durus[1] (the interface is simpler) and possibly using Schevo, but then I jump to the Schevo site [2]. And see that someone has already done some work on integrating schevo with TG [3]. [1] http://www.mems-exchange.org/software/durus/ [2] http://schevo.org/trac/ [3] http://schevo.org/trac/wiki/SchevoGears Haven't looked beyond that, but that may be interesting if you don't mind LGPL'd code. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
