I think he meant "Why not make the *software* free (as in freedom), not just service?"

Sorry if I misunderstood what the original author meant. It was very clear that the *service* is free, which is a good thing ;)

Thanks!

Eric

On 9/5/06, Owen Mead-Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks,

Actually the software is free. I'm curious how you thought it was paid
for, as other may think the same.

-Owen <><



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to