> > I think one of TurboGears advantage is hide the lower infrastructure > > from developers, > > but @xxx_handler let me feel "low" and changed my mind flow. > > > > 4. @error and @exception make sense for me and fit the decorators > > naming consistency. > > I don't have any objection here since it fits my brain equally well: > > "who'll handle the error/exception on the form is ..." > > or > > "errors/exceptions will be redirected(?)/handled(?)/taken care of(?) by ..." > > (Hmm... Writing the above makes me like the "_handle" there since it makes it > an easier association with the meaning of the thing...) > > -- > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My thought is that since we use all decorators to handle something, "@" is a decorator sign to notice us that fact. It's no need to tell ourself again that "the decorator is used to handle something" -- Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
