Mark Ramm wrote:
>> ... I suspect what's either (possibly) missing or (more likely) not
>> currently pointed to determinedly enough is an architectural overview
>> showing the API relationships of the current bits. The famous graphic is
>> OK in terms of the gross relationships between the components, but after
>> a month working part-time with TG I'm only just beginning to feel that I
>> understand the architecture.
> 
> This isn't what you're looking for exactly, but it did help me
> visualize the relationship between the components in one fairly simple
> graphic.
> 
> But you're right, we need to link to this more prominently, and we
> need to create better visual representations of our architecture.
> 
> http://www.checkandshare.com/blog/?p=34
> 
It's an excellent explanatory aid. I wish it had been available when I 
started using TG. It helps a lot.

regards
  Steve

PS One minor nit: "Postgress" should be "PostgreSQL".
-- 
Steve Holden       +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd          http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb       http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings     http://del.icio.us/steve.holden

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to