On 11/13/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another alternative: We could start building parallel docs in > the 1.1 area.
I don't want to do parallel docs because I don't want to maintain two sets of docs, as previously mentioned. I will definitely implement something like my suggestion before I go about maintaining two sets of docs. > I thought I'd mention this, because > we'll want to make 1.1 docs as it's developed so that we don't have a > giant doc-lag-time at the end of the release cycle. IMO this particular docs lag is caused by the docudo since we were waiting for docudo to become usable before we started writing docs. I'll be providing ongoing docs coverage for future development, which will be easier as I don't have to write quite so many docs at once and I can write the docs as I learn the modules. I do request that people provide docstrings, as that will be our next big hurdle. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
