[EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ tg-admin quickstart foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/tg-admin", line 7, in ?
sys.exit(
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools- 0.6c3-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 236, in load_entry_point
return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c3-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 2097, in load_entry_point
return ep.load()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c3-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 1830, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/TurboGears-1.0b1-py2.4.egg/turbogears/__init__.py", line 21, in ?
ext = entrypoint.load()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools- 0.6c3-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py", line 1830, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Myghty-1.1-py2.4.egg/myghty/importer.py", line 54, in import_module
return builtin_importer(name, globals, locals, fromlist)
ImportError: No module named tgfastdata.plugin
</snip>
what I will probably do to remedy this, is install python2.4 manually, I am guessing that something is up with the python default install with FC6. Also note that I tried using 'Yum' to install which again worked fine, but would not let me run tg-admin.
I am not saying this to complain at all, I will remedy it. I am just letting you guys know that there are issues with FC6 and TG.
Mike
On 11/14/06,
Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Thomas Weholt wrote:
>
> I've been a fan of Turbogears since the first announcement, but
> recently I've become more and more sceptical about using it. It's
> ok to
> build a framework on third-party modules, but in turbogears this is
> beginning to look crazy. Just look at the list of packages listed at
> http://www.turbogears.org/download/index.html . I don't know how
> many of
> these you absolutely need to get turbogears running, but all my
> attempts at downloading the latest release have failed lately because
> of some missing third-party module or something that won't compile.
This is part of the reason why I created the new tgsetup script. It
removes some more details.
In fact, the plan is for there to be *more* dependencies, not
fewer... because, we're breaking more parts of TurboGears itself into
reusable parts (like the widgets).
> This was no problem in the start of the project. It was a brilliant
> showcase of good use of setuptools. If there's a way around this, to
> download just the core modules you need to get started it should be
> better documented on the homepage.
The download page needs to change to just say this:
1. Install Python
2. Download tgsetup.py
3. Run tgsetup.py
That's it.
> And as more and more users switch to
> python 2.5 turbogears lags behind because alot of the third-party
> modules aren't 2.5-compatible.
Actually, Pyrex has been the main holdup. As Jorge mentioned, at this
point we should be able to make things work with 2.5, but someone
needs to try it out.
> I've also tried to keep track of the progress of Turbogears using the
> trac.turbogears.org-site, but the roadmap shows little or no progress
> lately. Are there being done any serious work on the core issues?
A few people have gone in and helped clean things up a lot. Some
issues will get attention and others won't... it's all a question of
what people's priorities are.
If someone steps forward on the turbogears-trunk list and says "I
want to fix this bug, any pointers?" I think they'd get some useful
help and get the bug fixed.
> Sorry, if this seems like just complaining, and you can say "Why don't
> you dive into the code, fix the bugs, contribute patches etc." all you
> want. I've been sitting on the fence waiting for turbogears to reach
> 1.0, be easy to download and use and then suggest it as an alternative
> to .NET-based solutions at my workplace. My first encounter with
> turbogears was love at first sight so I really want turbogears to be a
> success.
Things are getting cleaned up, docs are getting cleaned up and put
together and tgsetup eliminates a bunch of installation hassle. There
are probably a couple more bugs that absolutely must get fixed, but
otherwise I think the product is pretty good.
> I wish my timeschedule allowed me more time to work on projects like
> this, then maybe I could really contribute and help solve some of the
> issues I've mentioned here. Many of you guys probably have the same
> problem. But anyway, keep up the good work. I *do* appreciate the work
> you do, even if this message might make you think I don't.
It's always good to hear both the good and bad of people's
impressions of our software. Thanks for sharing!
Kevin
--
-mike
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
