On 1/5/07, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Steve Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can I take the lack of response on this to mean that no one would have > any objections to my submitting a patch? I was waiting for someone else to answer, but I don't see a need for that. And in fact, I'm a bit against that.
same here
For small datagrids it doesn't matter "traffic-wise", but for big ones it is more information to transfer, more structures for the browser to deal with, more details depending on what we're doing at the DOM tree, etc.
agreed
> Actually, it seems to me that there are more places that classes and > ids need to be applied wrt widgets. e.g. label fields don't get an id.
If you really need this I think the way to go is make a subclass of the widget and use it on your project. remenber TG is a framework for writting anything so we should cover the more general case, and be extendable and pluggable for the specific cases like this one. @Adam better go the other way around make the discussion and then the patch, if in the discussion it gets regested then there is no time wasted writing code :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
