On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 20:20 -0800, iain duncan wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-01 at 22:03 -0500, Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:26 PM, iain duncan wrote: > > > > > Personally, my instinct would be to go with: > > > - 1.0 Stable - download from site(s), always available with mirrors as > > > tarballs ( this does not currently exist, I have no idea why ) > > > - 1.1 Devel - Testing beta version of new features for us all to grab, > > > ability to update individual parts alone would be cool ( much like > > > pinning in Debian ) > > > - SVN - checkout, the real moving target > > > > I should note that right now there is no equivalent to "1.1 Devel" in > > releases. We just released 1.0 and the next feature release will > > either be 1.1 or 2.0 depending on where Alberto decides to make the cut. > > Sorry, I was unclear on what I was getting at there. The numbering was > meant not to reflect the current numbering of TG, but was rather > referring to the even/odd numbering scheme of the linux kernel.
Hmm, rereading this, I suppose that's not too clear either, lots of people don't know about the kernel numbering! The scheme is that even numbers in the second place ( ie 2.4, 2.6 ) denote stable production releases, while odd numbers are the kernel in active development. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
