iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The scheme is that even numbers in the second place ( ie 2.4, 2.6 ) > denote stable production releases, while odd numbers are the kernel in > active development.
I prefer that every release is suitable for production unless it has an 'a', 'b' or 'dev' in it (for 'alpha', 'beta' and 'development' versions). 'rc' are 'release candidates' so they should change very little. This way we won't have to explain the version numbering scheme -- the letters are common practice in software devel -- or have to care with several "current" versions. The idea is reducing the timeframe from one relese to another. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
