On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:37 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: > Dieter wrote: > > Great, I think this should be put on the TG website for marketing > > purposes :) ... Choice and flexibility is one thing I like about > > TurboGears although I go by the defaults. But it's a good feeling to > > know i can deviate from the default path if I want... something that > > monolithic frameworks like Django and Rails do not provide, > > unfortunately. > > Except that this isn't true. Both Django and Rails can be used with > alternate template engines and can use different ORMs. As with > TurboGears you might miss out on some of the built-in functionality if > you do so, but that's the choice you make when you deviate from the > mainstream.
Django loses much more significant portions of its whole if you change the ORM and the template engine though. So, while not precisely true, the statement is still in general a valid point. See here: http://www.cmlenz.net/blog/2006/08/the_python_web_.html ( A bit old, but as far as I know, still valid. Correct me if I'm wrong. ) Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
