percious, el 25 de enero a las 20:48 me escribiste:
> This is also my experience.  I spent many hours hacking SO to do what I
> want, even when it was a simple many-to-one (as apposed to one-to-many)
> relationship.  SA solved this easily with the 'backref' option.  (just
> one example)
> 
> I don't think there is any extra typing, because you need all 3 objects
> to be separate for separate things.  It makes it easier to handle MVC
> separately in my opinion, because the class you map to is totally
> separate from the way it maps to the database, so you could easily use
> that class somewhere else, hooking in your own Database/Data management
> system.

Well, this is not the only approach. Another approach is to think you just
have objects in you app, and the persistence is just an accident. You
store your data in a relational database just because is the best way (is
it? ;) in the present, but you just don't care how data is stored. So
hidding this problem to the user (rather than making it write the guts of
it) is a good thing (TM). It's just a point of view. Anyways, I think SA
is a great base to build this kind of abstraction.

> The support offered by Mike Bayer is particularly stellar, especially
> considering he almost single-handedly created and manages SQLAlchemy on
> his own time.  He has personally responded to simple problems I have on
> more than one occasion.

I'm not attacking the project or his leader, I repeat. It's a great
project, I'm just telling it wasn't good for my particular needs. And I'm
saying it's not yes suitable as a default component to TG yet.

> As for fighting, if you are fighting with it, usually it just means
> that you need to read a bit more into the documentation.

I read all the documentation. Did you make an intensive use of
inheritance? What model of inheritance are you using?

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
 .------------------------------------------------------------------------,
  \  GPG: 5F5A8D05 // F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05 /
   '--------------------------------------------------------------------'
And I am not frightened of dying, any time will do, I
don't mind. Why should I be frightened of dying?
There's no reason for it, you've gotta go sometime.
If you can hear this whispering you are dying.
I never said I was frightened of dying.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to