On 29 jan, 20:17, "venkatbo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/LightTPD
> way at the bottom, in the "caveats" section... It has to do with
> RAM-based CP session mgmt not working properly with
> flup-based lighty (possibly-nginx-and-other-too) proxying.
> For some reason, session info "persisted" on one thread
> doesn't seem to become available for some latter formed
> new threads.

A bug somewhere should not prevent any improvement or features !
It must be found and corrected!
But users should be noticed for known issues.

>
> Also, by default, CP's session mgmt creates a SessionID
> (and a cookie) for every request coming in to the TG-app.
> This can be problematic for cases of low resource (RAM or
> disk-space) availability. In theory, someone ould bang the
> system, have numerous sessions get created. The problem
> is multiplied, when the sesion-mgmt cleanup logic doesn't
> get triggered (assuming you have not configured right) in a
> timely fashion, reclaiming the resources used for these
> bogus sessions.

The idea is to add the feature to TG and not use CP anymore !

>
> I think you proposal may work if:
>   1. CP's sessionfilter is rewritten taking the above pts into
>       consideration
>   2. Folks are disuaded from requiring/using RAM-based
>       sessions in proxy-based usage scenarios, and
>   3. Session mgmt (cleanup) etc are trigggered in a timely
>       fashion, so resource usage is more resonable.

1. NA CP is not the target
2. developers are supposed to use the good tools for the good purposes
3. of course

Alain


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to