On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 21:50 -0500, Karl Guertin wrote: > On 2/2/07, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It says that one needs to use the shell if using SA, which I would take > > to mean that the shell examples would work. but > > > > g.addUser(u) > > > > gets an error message that the group has no method addUser() and I see > > in the identity code in my model, that there are no methods defined at > > all on group. Is this tutorial SO only? > > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/4005bb55625f5378/1cad0c6096808d7f
Ha ha, man I can't even remember what I've tried anymore. Well, as the misleading wording is still there, what do you suggest gets done about it? I still believe it would be better to clearly state that the tutorial does not cover SA. Which also made me wonder, why not add an addUser() method to the SA API and make them more consistent? ( Wrapping the g.users.appennd(u) ) Are there good reasons to not do so that I'm not thinking of? > > [1] > http://www.splee.co.uk/2006/10/28/simpleblog-part-3-many-to-many-relationships/ yeah I used that, Lees tutorials are really good. Doesn't cover the particular use case I'm trying to get working though. I'll keep hunting through the SA docs. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
