On 2/5/07, tamara6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 10:07 am, "Karl Guertin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/5/07, tamara6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > With my answer. I think documentation for SO could be better. I feel > > > like it has been forgotten in the rush for SA. > > > > That would be true if we had docs for SA. Actually, we're trying to > > get TG-specific components covered first and then branch out into > > filling in component documentation. > > I don't think Jorge Vargas agrees with you:
not really. I think the problem here is that your used to the django way, in django everything the framework is is done by the same team, django templates, django db api, django foo and dejango bar, TG is totally different in this place. I posted a link below to the Philosophy page. We are doing the bet of integrating third party to concentrate on making a tool based on the best that is available for each task. now this of course has the problem (which you are experiencing) that the best varies from person to person and from project to project. Now it's your opinion that SO needs more docs I'll suggest to contribute at their documentation instead of complaining to either TG or SO. if you don't think your qualified to do so, then write something even a blog post that could be the base for a better contribution. On Feb 5, 11:37 am, "Jorge Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I want to say with this is that > > we are aware of the situation we know there is a problem but it seems to > be > > the concensus that it's better to move to SA then "fix SO" either at the > > docs or code level. > > Look, TG is using SO *right now* If you don't want to write docs for > SO then make the switch to SA immediately and write docs for it. The > point is that it is just plain dumb to incorporate something as a tool > and then not have docs for how to use it. your missing the point, we do not need to duplicate documentation, it's on http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/Philosophy if it's already exist lets use it. As for "incorporate" something I believe your lacking in history of the project back when it started when Kevin came up with the idea of TG itself this was the best tool. And it is very confusing to use who are just starting out. If I use > SO today, will support be dropped for it tomorrow? no it will never be drop it will just stop being the default, same with kid same with whatever else we replace. Will I have to re-write everything using SA in a year? If so, just say so. maybe it all depends on what extra tools you want TG won't force you but maybe you will force yourself because there is-this-really-nice-component that only works on top of SA. I'll go > away and come back when your projoect is more stable. But if support > for SO will continue, then docs written for it today will not be > wasted because they will still be of some use in the future. now in general I don't like your tone specially because I'm giving you my opinion and your taking it as the TG opinion. Tamara > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
