[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Um...isn't that broken? I thought to_python was supposed to
> convert a value from the string representation to the Python
> representation. In which case v.to_python('0') should be False, as
> should v.to_python("False"). Or at least the latter...
It is True for Python so why should the validator change that behavior?
>>> bool('0')
True
>>> bool('')
False
>>> bool('False')
True
>>>
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
