Jonathan LaCour a écrit : > Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > > >> Indeed and I was very happy to learn about the integration but I found >> that a bit randomly, it's too bad that there hasn't been a clearer and >> wider announcement about it. It's really hard to understand where the >> project stands currently :( >> > > Yes, we didn't really do a very good job of publicizing the sprint this > past weekend, or explaining what it was about. This is largely because > it was designed as an experiment to see if it would be possible to write > TurboGears 2.0 on top of Pylons, and was put together so quickly. > > TurboGears on top of Pylons is appealing for a lot of the reasons > given in the original message. TurboGears and Pylons are extremely > similar projects with extremely similar goals, and it makes little > sense to me for both of them to duplicate so much effort. For a while, > TurboGears was moving at breakneck speed from both a development and a > marketing perspective, but the project has slowed down quite a bit in > both aspects. I think this has a lot to do with the weight of so much > code on the shoulders of very few people, a lot of which doesn't really > belong in the core of a web framework. > > If we reduce this burden by taking advantage of what is available > elsewhere, we can focus on keeping the core small, and encouraging > people to build on top of it with separate projects that can take > advantage of all the WSGI-goodness that we will have access to. > > As for where the project is headed, who knows? The experiment this past > weekend was a resounding success in the eyes of all that were > present, but > there is still a lot to do. A frank discussion about how to move > forward > is probably in order, and I think that will happen very soon. > > Thanks to you and Mark about giving us some feedback. I should acknowledge that Mark did tell me that the sprint had been decided rapidly and therefore you guys had lacked the time to announce it any further.
Nonetheless I'm happy you folks go into that direction, I believe this is the best one you could choose to. - Sylvain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
