On 6/25/07, JeffRo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just read the other thread about the crossroads where the TG
> community finds itself (http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/
> browse_thread/thread/
> 1ca94fbf44c69050/77177ca67b491355#77177ca67b491355) and am trying to
> make a decision about my own project.
>
> I just started with TG and am progressively getting up to speed with
> it.  I'm using TG with SQLObject and Kid and Mochikit, just as the
> site and book suggest.  I can see why others have expressed opinions
> about confusion with the platform, though I've never seen a best-of-
> breed stack not have to deal with the issue of explaining
> integration.  Lack of documentation is an addressable issue; lack of
> direction is another thing entirely.
>
> I consider myself a newbie on this stack, so I'm looking for some
> aggregate guidance (not a sales pitch): do I proceed with my project
> on TG 1.0, do I port to Pylons, or do I find something else until
> there's better progress?
TG1.0 and TG1.1 will be around for a long time the pygears experiment
as someone else said is a possible TG2.0 and it's goal is to how it's
going in the case this becomes the future TG will probably become to
pylons what plone is to zope. without all the heavy stuff :)

>
> thx,
> jr
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to