Hi Mark, Mark Ramm schrieb: > First, I think Identity has a good syntax for checking authorization, > and if we can keep that syntax but have a more plugable backend we'll > be in really good shape.
Agreed. In the last months I aggregated a feature list I expect from an 'identity-like' system. Most of them are related to session control and user db backends so I'm really interested developing 'identity2'. Probably I can spend some paid time in next month to implement certain key features. Where do you plan to discuss/develop this? Especially if others (e.g. pylons+co) should join, a TG group may not be the right place. > Second, Authentication and Authorization should probably be split out > into separate packages. While this might be a good idea, we should make using it as easy as possible: There should be no overhead due to the authentication/authorization split for small projects. TG should (IMHO) scale down as much as possible. fs --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
