> > > Are any of these fancy effect JavaScript libraries particularly better > > > at standards compliance and accessibility? I love some of the > > > effects, but want to attempt to keep my site readable on cell phones, > > > Braille displays, and text-to-speech systems -- not to mention keeping > > > it somewhat readable for people who use lynx or the like. > > > > Well, in this case you can happily live without javascript at all :) > > I was really asking if there was one that "degrades" (or whatever the > term is) when faced with an insurmountable challenge. I want the > special effects, if the browser and person at the other end are > capable of taking advantage of them.
Although not a very informed guess but your best option probably is simply first selecting by platform/browser/capabilities/etc and then serve the content appropriate for each. So for ordinary browsers that support js you can go ahead with the js libraries people recommended above and for cell phones, Braille, text-to-speech, lynx and what not simply don't display any js. I don't think any js library can be made as cross-platform as your needs are. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
