On Sat, 2008-16-02 at 00:01 +0000, Nick Murdoch wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:30:57 -0000, George Sakkis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Replacing Genshi with Cheetah or Mako for better performance, > > modularity and reusability (XIncludes and match templates suck). > > Unless your application absolutely must be the fastest it can possibly be, > I wouldn't switch away from Kid/Genshi. I used Cheetah in one old project > and the templates quickly become unmanageable with the difference between > Cheetah markup blocks and HTML-logical blocks. I also find Cheetah syntax > clunky and annoying. I imagine the same for Mako.
Yeah, I'd second that. I used kid/genshi for quite a while without really sitting down and going through the whole docs on the genshi site, and just didn't realize how well done it is. It's very easy to use genshi at a surface level and only see reap the disadvantages. But once you learn it well, it's really well designed ( IMHO ). Genshi functions are great. If this is a production project and you don't have time to get stalled on anything, I would hold off on toscawidgets and do the upgrade to latest SA and Genshi. I did the same thing recently and was surprised at easy it was to upgrade those two. Mako might be an option, but it will be way more work. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
