On Tue, 2008-08-04 at 17:44 +0200, Florent Aide wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Christopher Arndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > > Although I find this interesting, I don't understand why peopple always > > think that anything from Google is the best thing since sliced bread. To > > me, this basically is just another cheap hosting provider with a > > non-standard Python installation, which causes unecessary work for the > > developer. If you need the power to serve ten-thousands of users daily, > > you should be able to afford your own hosting and thereby have full > > control over your environment. > > For me this is more a question of marketing. We cannot afford to stay > too long without at least a document to explain people how to deploy > their TG2 application on top of GGAE... or we must face the > consequences.
Very true. It would be extremely unwise from a marketing perspective to just ignore it. And really, if google does make it easy to get python web apps up and going with them, many people are going to find it attractive as a way to test out python web dev. The state of commodity hosting for python is still pretty crappy after all! Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
