On Aug 22, 3:48 am, "Jorge Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did I misread this or you said django can be used with SA? As far as I
> know the only efforts this way are an almost-death[1] branch (2yrs
> old) and a very experimental project [2]
>
> anyway just wanted to clarify that, even with [2] django is build in
> such a way that most if not all of the existing apps won't work out of
> the box, which is kind of the big killer for django.
I hadn't researched django/sqlalchemy deeply as their mailing list had
reported very recent successes. Since that was one of the main
reasons I looked at TurboGears over Django, it intrigued me, but, not
enough to move focus.
More of django's sample apps work out of the box than TurboGears and
there are more of them. Of the ones that break, typically its a
relatively easy fix or typo that slipped in from a bad cut and paste.
Most of the TG2 errors appear to be examples lifted from TG1 that have
some of the obvious changes hacked in without having tested the code
which makes it difficult to evaluate a platform.
All in all, we're still focused on TG2.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
