On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:53 PM, a.fowler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Certainly a reasonable fear.
>
> Of course, some people would say that even bad press is good
> advertising. :)
>
> That is why it's essential that users are aware of, and expecting, the
> poor CGI performance.
>
> I don't considere myself knowledgeable enough to write authoritative
> docs, but I would be wiling to help review/test them.
>
> Though, perhaps I can write a provisional "configuration guide" as I
> document an attempt to get CGI working with TG2.
>

Dude I'm sorry but I totally disagree with you in most reasons why TG
should have a "how to run as CGI" tutorial but that's me.

So if you (or anyone else for that matter) wants to write that
documentation please go ahead. We'll review it and include it as a
valid configuration. Although I believe it should have a big header
saying all the short comings from this thread.

Here you have instructions on how to make this document happen
http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/docs/main/Contributing.html#contributing-documentation

You will need to edit this a litte
http://svn.turbogears.org/docs/2.0/docs/main/Deployment.rst and add a
file here http://svn.turbogears.org/docs/2.0/docs/main/Deployment/

I just wanted to point out one thing. running paster with 0.0.0.0 is
not public to the world but public to the lan (if your "restricted"
system is so tied in)

As for the knowledgeable part, well you know there is only one way to
learn, and that's by doing something about it.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to