On Oct 19, 1:37 pm, Daniel Fetchinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The survey makes it sound like 1.5 is alive again. (This is the > > CherryPy 3.0 version). I thought it had been killed?
No, it isn't dead. It's just pining for the fjords! ;) > I also would like to know the details, especially because the > gearshift projecthttp://code.google.com/p/python-gearshift/ aims to > do something similar as tg 1.5. What's the latest? :) One reason for doing this survey was to find out, whether there is still interest in further development of a CherryPy based TG version or if we just do a couple more maintenance releases of the TG 1.1 branch and then let it rest. I would be interested in working on TG 1.5 but I am only willing to put effort in this, if there is sufficient interest. The TG 1 developer base is very small now (basically only three active devs atm), and continuing to evolve the TG 1 code base would mean a serious commitment and I'm not even sure there is a place for it in the Python web framework world. I certainly think that it would not make sense to continue both branches under the umbrella of the "TurboGears" moniker, but that's just my opinion. On the other hand, I get often get reports from people running still on TG 1 and no intention of switching soon. So, give us some time to evaluate the results of the survey and we'll hopefully be able to give a more informed answer to this question soon. We will publish our evaluation as soon as possible and probably give you all access to the detailed answers (anonymized, of course!). Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
