Martin, responses below.
cheers. -chris On Nov 23, 3:57 pm, Martin Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > Many thanks worked a treat, I should have realised that that was > where the setting should be. > > For what it is worth I am finding the TurboGears documentation > very good. In fact it seems better for a new person than the > pylons (yes I know it is based on that). If I will be doing more > development with it then I will look into helping out with > documentation. This is good to hear, thanks for the positive feedback. > > percious: it must be frustrating to get both a good release > date and the documentation ready. I don't think frustration is the right word. It's a matter that there are more hours of work required to "finish" the docs than I have hours in a day/week/month. Here is a list of todo items in the docs: http://turbogears.org/2.1/docs/todo.html and here are the list of items from the ticketing system: http://trac.turbogears.org/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=2.1+docs I would like to organize another sprint in the _near_ future, but I also have some work to do to get c5t (a Mongo-TG cms) out now that TG has a formal release. I would ask that someone would step up to organize the sprint, and I will do what I can to participate. cheers. -chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
