Wow, That's about the most negative response I've seen in sometime. Yes, I could have held up the 2.1 release, I saw this happen back in the days of 0.8/1.0 TG, and it ultimately hurt the community. I would encourage anyone seeing a hole in our documentation to please ask how to contribute and I will be more than willing to send some info their direction. I did care that the docsprint got cancelled. Yes, I would like to see more people help with the work that has to be done. Yes, I plan to support TG for the coming future and I am not looking at a merger as an absolute solution to our challenges. We have a user-base that provides 300 unique visitors to our documentation a day. If 1% helped out on that we'd have more than enough contribution to give the docs the necessary love. On the other hand, I understand the asking folks to write documentation is nearly impossible, and I do what I can with my free time to provide the software updates that are so required to keep the framework modern.
cheers. -chris On Nov 21, 5:00 am, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 21.11.2010 05:37 schrieb Victor: > > Thanks, I thought this should be added to document, it would be help > > for people who encountered same issue. :) > > I think the same, and had hoped the docs would be brought in shape > *before* the 2.1 release, but the planned doc sprint was cancelled and > nobody cared. Our main developers don't have enough time and our users > don't get involved, contribute or help out. Sadly, that's the state of > Turbogears for some time already and we have to live with it or put our > hope on the merge with Pyramid/Pylons. > > -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
