>> I guess my big question would be this: Why not use simplejson, which >> includes encode/decode functions as part of the module? >> > > Simplejson as the json module should only encode/decode data > structures, not objects. > > I think that there should be a way to automate it for any type of > object by using the pickle protocol (not the pickle module, but the > protocol/interface), otherwise accessing the __dict__ should work but > it isn't a very clean way to do it and must also be done recursively.
I don't get this either, just like Michael. If you have a json object, you probably got it from a python object which was json-able and you serialized it using the json/simplejson module. If this is so, what stops the OP from using the json/simplejson module to decode back to python? Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
