On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Daniel Fetchinson <[email protected]> wrote: > If you have a json object, you probably got it from a python object > which was json-able and you serialized it using the json/simplejson > module.
That is indeed not actually true, you might be getting the JSON from any remote source or different software. JSONEncode by itself can only encode/decode base types not any kind of object. I understood that he wants to encode/decode his own objects, which would required to subclass the .default method of the JSONEncoder or find a way to extract the object as a dict. > If this is so, what stops the OP from using the > json/simplejson module to decode back to python? > As far as I understood his only problem is actually that he has to serialize/deserialize objects instead of base types. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
