On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have three options:
> 1. Get Kajiki to support Python 2.4. Alessandro already did this, but the
> problem is ongoing support. Future updates could drop the support as easily
> as it gets added back in.

I did it just for fun so I'm really interested in maintaining it
especially as I don't have any
production system running python2.4 anymore.

> 2. Drop Kajiki support in our code base. From everything I've seen, Kajiki
> has better performance than Genshi. I would like to keep Kajiki around as an
> option, and maybe (someday) move default development to it instead of Genshi
> (but that is a ways off, at least a year, don't worry).

I'm really against this, I got used to using both genshi and kajiki
together, and
I'm starting to think that they are a really good couple as you can
also start with genshi
and quickly switch to kajiki if required.

Most of my apps currently use kajiki for helpers or partial templates
to gain performance
boost of things that you show multiple times per page.

> 3. Drop Python 2.4 support.
>

I would suggest doing this for TG2.1 while we can keep TG2.0
compatible with Py2.4

> Now, the major problem is RedHat 5.x and CentOS 5.x. They run Python 2.4,
> and upgrading the system Python will raise issues with yum. As such, we're
> going to see places where people will be deploying on RH% and CentOS5, and
> we can't avoid this. The question becomes: Do we support this?

To install Python2.5 on CentOS there are some ready made RPM that install
it as an alternative interpreter which can be used to create the
virtualenv for TG without
touching yum or the other python based software. I think that we just
need to document
this in the "Installation" section for Centos users to make everybody happy.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.

Reply via email to