Excerpts from Michael Pedersen's message of Fri May 20 00:02:03 -0400 2011:
> Our current development tree provides support for Kajiki. Kajiki does not
> support Python 2.4.
> 
> We have three options:
> 1. Get Kajiki to support Python 2.4. Alessandro already did this, but the
> problem is ongoing support. Future updates could drop the support as easily
> as it gets added back in.
> 2. Drop Kajiki support in our code base. From everything I've seen, Kajiki
> has better performance than Genshi. I would like to keep Kajiki around as an
> option, and maybe (someday) move default development to it instead of Genshi
> (but that is a ways off, at least a year, don't worry).
> 3. Drop Python 2.4 support.

In the past we've put quite a bit of effort to keep our stack Py2.4
compliant. It's not very difficult, but every now and then a new release
of a dependency will contain a 'with' satement or a ternary operation.
It'll most likely keep happening too. Thankfully, our Jenkins instance
runs our test suites against 2.4 and 2.6.

I'm in favor of option #1. We've made it this far remaining 2.4
compliant, and as far as I know our stack is still willing to support it
too. If any of our core components decides to break support, then I
think we'll need to reconsider it.

> Now, the major problem is RedHat 5.x and CentOS 5.x. They run Python 2.4,
> and upgrading the system Python will raise issues with yum. As such, we're
> going to see places where people will be deploying on RH% and CentOS5, and
> we can't avoid this. The question becomes: Do we support this?

RHEL/Cent 5 is not as much of a problem as it used to be.  At the
sprints 2 PyCons ago, we created python2.6 packages for RHEL5 which are
now in the EPEL repositories[0].

luke

[0]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.

Reply via email to