On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't help but be amused that a week ago I posted a rant about wikis > (see http://codersbuffet.blogspot.com/2012/01/wikis-suck.html ), and then > this topic comes up. >
I mostly agree with your points, but actually, apart being authoritative, they apply also to sphinx. I'm really curious about this because even with a closed system it should be an improvement to the doc management process. it should mean switching from: - git pull doc - apply your changes - build doc - wait around half a minute - open built doc in the browser to check your changes. to: - click edit - apply your changes - check your changes > My views? Use the git docs. They work. They got hampered by my real life > requirements over the past 6 months. I > Well nothing prevents your from still keeping git as the wiki storage system. To me a wiki is just an interaction pattern, not its implementation. Adding inplace online edit to readthedocs.org for example would perfectly fit my definition of wiki system and might only speed up doc development process. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
