I just 3 month use Turbogear. Turbogear 2.1 template for me much easier to edit... May be I don't understand something. I am editing CSS files with my hands and my mind, as I can, not using editors pages or something like this. It better for me. I was scared, when so all those mountains of code (I am talking about CSS files only), which I not saw in Turbogear 2.1. For me more simple work with Turbogear 2.1... I am more than year working in web-development, may be I don't understand something.
суббота, 7 июля 2012 г., 23:49:21 UTC+4 пользователь Alessandro Molina написал: > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Am 07.07.2012 14:01, schrieb WebmasterLab: > > > >> Please, if possible, direct link... And. I have try TG 2.2, announced > >> here. Very hard to edit source site page. So much everything I don't > >> needed... > > > > > > If you're talking about the quickstart templates, I think there is a > > --minimal option which creates a much simpler project. > > > > Actually the comment really surprises me as the new quickstart has a > lot less files than the old one. > So should be less noise and files to delete. > > Comparing the various quickstart on html, css, images and javascript > files the numbers are: > 2.1 quickstart -> 37 files > 2.1 --minimal quickstart -> 20 files > 2.2 quickstart -> 19 files > > As you can see the new quickstart has even less files that the old one > in minimal mode, and this is the reason why the --minimal option also > got removed in 2.2 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/turbogears/-/Zt-uZJZ7NaYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
