Jim Marino wrote:
I maybe wasn't clear. I don't think we should force this through Axis2. I was just thinking it would be good to have an additional binding to SOAP/Axis2 as a proof-point of any binding design, not that the JMS work should be done through Axis2.

Jim


On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jim Marino wrote:


No problem that you are not Lance ;) I think a JMS binding
would be great. One of the work items we need to do is to
figure out a new binding strategy, particularly as we migrate
to Axis2. I think it would be a good idea to also validate this
against a JMS binding. I have the start of some ideas for that
I'll post to the list so we can begin discussion. I think the
binding work can be done in parallel to some of the changes we
are making in the proxy/wire/invocation/ builder layer. So,
when I'll try and write up those thoughts and we can discuss
in more detail.


Sounds good. Dims has on a couple occasions invited me to get
involved with Axis2, which is a fine idea, but I'm not sure why
non-SOAP bindings such as JMS (or File, Email, etc) have to be
integrated into Tuscany via a SOAP stack. Or am I misunderstanding
what Axis2 is bringing to the table as far as Tuscany is
concerned?

--Jack Unrue
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Yes I think we can use another binding as a proof-point of our binding integration design.

Looks like we're reaching some consensus on this roadmap, so I updated it with the input from this discussion and posted it to our wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Roadmap. I think we can also use this page to see what people want to volunteer to work on and where we have open areas. Could people in the group take a look, see if I missed or mis-interpreted anything, and add their names to the items they're already working on or want to sign up for? Please don't bother with presentation for now, you can just add your names at the end of or under each line... After a first round of updates I'll take care of fighting with Wiki to turn this into a nice table. Thanks.

--
Jean-Sebastien

Reply via email to