Its still in SVN under sca/bindings, but its not part of the build, neither are helloworldaxis or helloworldaxissvc part of the build. All these haven't been part of the build since we moved up to Axis2. As it hasn't been part of the build binding.axis now fails if you try to build it.
They'll be in SVN history and I'm not really convinced they have so much value now anyway...how about we delete them. ...ant On 3/29/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a minor issue: the binding.axis is gone from the latest revision. > Is > it on purpose? It seems the "helloworldaxis" and "helloworldaxissvc" still > have dependencies on it. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:38 AM > Subject: Re: Project structure > > > Ok I've finished this move now and a clean checkout/build seems to work. > > ...ant > > On 3/28/06, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just a reminder I said I do this...will give it a shot tomorrow morning > > GMT. > > > > ...ant > > > > > > On 3/24/06, Jeremy Boynes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ant elder wrote: > > > > Can we turn this into a lazy consensus vote - if theres no -1s after > > > next > > > > Tuesday I'll make the change. > > > > > > > > No one is particularly wedded to this structure, so if you'd rather > an > > > > alternative post it. Its also not cast in stone, I don't see why we > > > can't > > > > review it again in some months. > > > > > > > > > > I'm +1 on the restructure. > > > > > > I think you may need to move the tomcat module into a separate tree as > > > well as it depends on the containers and bindings. > > > > > > -- > > > Jeremy > > > > > > > > >
