ant elder wrote:
Its still in SVN under sca/bindings, but its not part of the build, neither
are helloworldaxis or helloworldaxissvc part of the build. All these haven't
been part of the build since we moved up to Axis2. As it hasn't been part of
the build binding.axis now fails if you try to build it.
They'll be in SVN history and I'm not really convinced they have so much
value now anyway...how about we delete them.
...ant
On 3/29/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a minor issue: the binding.axis is gone from the latest revision.
Is
it on purpose? It seems the "helloworldaxis" and "helloworldaxissvc" still
have dependencies on it.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected] >
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: Project structure
Ok I've finished this move now and a clean checkout/build seems to work.
...ant
On 3/28/06, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a reminder I said I do this...will give it a shot tomorrow morning
GMT.
...ant
On 3/24/06, Jeremy Boynes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Can we turn this into a lazy consensus vote - if theres no -1s after
next
Tuesday I'll make the change.
No one is particularly wedded to this structure, so if you'd rather
an
alternative post it. Its also not cast in stone, I don't see why we
can't
review it again in some months.
I'm +1 on the restructure.
I think you may need to move the tomcat module into a separate tree as
well as it depends on the containers and bindings.
--
Jeremy
+1 from me. We may want to resurrect the axis1 binding at some point
later maybe... if we ever run into blocking issues trying to communicate
with existing web services with Axis2 (but I'm not even sure about
that). I think we should focus on getting our Axis2 integration work
well, and we can always get old code back from the SVN history so I'm +1
for deleting them for now.
--
Jean-Sebastien
