This chain of +1s is truly good for the spirit, so FWIW, not being a committer, +1 from me too
On 7/14/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 ...ant On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello fellow committers, > Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back > I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've > held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want > to add any more fuel to the fire. I now feel I have to speak up: to > be honest about this, I was really disheartened that it has came to > pass that we as a community so soon moved to having to fall back on > "The Rules for Revolutionaries". While this seems to be acceptable > path for a Apache project, I don't feel that makes right for > Tuscany. I think there is a fundamental difference in the stages of > projects that followed that route and the stage that Tuscany > currently is at and survived as a project.. Many of these projects > were fairly mature, they had a much larger pool of core developers > to draw on both sides, they had a much larger user base, and for the > most part they were based on mature specifications. I agree that in > some stages in the life time of a project a revolution is > desperately needed to bring about innovation. I don't think this is > the case for Tuscany, I honestly don't think Tuscany is at the > stage where it can quite honestly survive such a split and still > gain traction in gaining commiters and users. > > I'd really like to request that we as a community once again focus > not as much on the technology which both branches have merit, but > consider the Tuscany project as a whole will be better served if we > make a decision on which will be the future today. Thus I'm > requesting as has been asked before if we can't take a vote on one > and once again move forward together as one. > > Specifcly: > > I would like to propose that we make the chanti tree the main trunk > and turn the current trunk into a maintainance branch. The chianti > code would be moved to tuscany/java and would be the main > development tree moving forward; the existing trunk would be moved > to branches/M1. Please vote if you agree with this proposal - as a > policy vote, at least 3 +1s and more +1's than -1's would be needed > to do this > > This is my +1 for this. > > Thanks > Rick > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson
