On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> How about the following reordering: > > > > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and > > maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of > > service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented > > runtime, supporting a range of technologies and based on the standards > > defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group, for distribution at no charge to the > > public. > > > > Simon > > > > This looks good to me, I have a few comments and questions: > > In addition to the programming model aspects, covered by "simplifies the > development of service oriented applications", how about adding > something to cover the deployment, configuration and management models? > Either add "service oriented networks" or at least change "development" > to "development and deployment"? > > I'm not sure how "a range of technologies" further expands the scope of > what we're doing, as the OpenCSA standards already span a range of > technologies. Is it really necessary? > > Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not > covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work, > and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered > by OpenCSA? Are they all covered by the "based on the standards defined > by OpenCSA" statement since they are related to either SCA or SDO? Ok, adding "deployment" and removing "a range of technologies" gives: a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development and deployment of service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented runtime based on the standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group, for distribution at no charge to the public. I wasn't sure where "service oriented networks" should go? And i haven't found a way to mention things we're doing that are not covered by OpenCSA and still keep it reasonably concise and sounding ok - can anyone else? ...ant
