I'm +1 on this. Comments in line Simon.
> > > > - Continue with SCA 1.x maintenance releases based on the current SCA > > 1.2 branch. This would be a more stable codebase, and we should avoid > > big changes that could brake backward compatibility here. > I propose that we create the branch for 1.x develop directly after 1.2 is out to make clear our intentions. It's not clear if the suggestion here is to create sca-java-1.X or sca-java-1.3. My vote would be for the latter (reserving sca-java-1.2.1 in case we need to address specific concerns in 1.2 that are not subject to ongoing maintenance activities). > > Thoughts ? > We may need to branch the documentation also. Normally I would suggest that we ask for a new space but as our documentation could not be considered complete for 1.1 and as the suggested first actions are internal restructuring we may find it less onerous to maintain 2.X documents alongside the the 1.X documents with suitable comments to point out where they diverge. Do people have a preference.
