ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
We may need to branch the documentation also. Normally I would suggest that
we ask for a new space but as our documentation could not be considered
complete for 1.1 and as the suggested first actions are internal
restructuring we may find it less onerous to maintain 2.X documents
alongside the the 1.X documents with suitable comments to point out where
they diverge. Do people have a preference.
I wondered about the doc too, if there was a new wiki space for 2.x could it
be initially be populated with the existing content? If so then it seems to
me like it would be easiest to have the new space than to try point out the
differences for each release all in the one space.
+1 on versioning and branching the docs and the wikis. Customers on
older levels will want to see the proper docs, configs, and samples for
their version, and customers on newer levels will want to see proper
docs, configs, and samples for their version. We should support them both.
(This is also how the Geronimo team is tacking docs and samples.)
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
