Hi All, -1 from me - there's one outstanding JIRA issue [1] which I don't feel is acceptable to be included on a release, a respin to resolve this issue would bring the release up to the normal high standards :)
Dave. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220 On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 6:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/04/2008, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > Java. > > > > The artifacts are available for review at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/ > > Sigs and hashes all OK. > > > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > > The source archive contains the empty directory tree > modules/osgi-runtime/.felix, which is not in SVN. It should be > removed. > > Likewise, the source contains itest/transaction/derbydb, which is not in SVN. > > mvn reports quite a few warnings when testing - e.g. > 12-Apr-2008 15:53:29 > org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.ExtensibleStAXArtifactProcessor > read > WARNING: Element > {http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0}implementation.java cannot be > processed. ([row,col {unknown-source}]: [50,9]) > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.094 sec > > Are these expected? > > There is an odd file: > > modules/core-databinding/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/core/databinding/transformers/IDLTransformerTestCase.java.fixme > which probably shoul be removed. > > Minor nits: > > BUILDING says: > "Change to the distributions folder" > that should be > "Change to the distribution folder" > > It would also be useful to warn people that the build needs lots of memory, > e.g. they may need to: > set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx128M (or more) > before attempting a build. > > > > and the Maven staging repository. > > > > The maven.xml descriptor at > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/maven/org/apache/tuscany/sca/ > only refers to the 5 tuscany-maven-* directories. There are lots more. > Should they not be included? I don't know nada about M2 repos, so I > could be wrong. > > > > > The eclipse updatesite for the Tuscany Eclipse plugins is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/updatesite/ > > > > The plugins jar NOTICE is different from the features jar NOTICE. > Even though the features jar does not contain any non-ASF code, it is > not usable without the plugins jar, so I would expect them to have the > same attributions. > > The top-level NOTICE agrees with the plugins jar which is good. > > > > > The release tag is available at : > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.2-RC3b/ > > > > > > Looks OK to me, here is my +1. > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
