Are there any _specific_ items people could suggest to improve the WS support for this upcoming release? The next steps thread from a while back was pretty quiet.
Axis2 already supports most things and interop's well so its 'just' a mater of integration with Tuscany. Attachments? raw doc style? headers? rpc/encoded? WS-X? Whats important to you? ...ant On 3/22/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's great. Perhaps we could look at that as part of the Axis > "cleanup work" which needs to be done? > > Jim > > On Mar 22, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > Jim, > > > > Axis2+Sandesha has already been thru WS-Addressing Interop and WS-RM > > Interop using both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 (specifically with > > Indigo/WCF). > > > > thanks, > > dims > > > > On 3/22/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Jim, > >> > >> > >>> 4. Additional bindings to Axis through integration with Celtix, > >>> particularly ws and JMS > >>> - Basic integration (p1) > >>> - Ability to retarget (p2) > >>> - Dan, would Celtix get us Indigo interop? > >>> > >> > >> Good question regarding the Indigo stuff. We do have Indigo > >> interop on > >> the roadmap, but I don't know the complete timetable or what that > >> really > >> means (since I know nothing about Indigo). > >> > >> That said, post milestone 5 of Celtix (next week), we have someone > >> that > >> will be doing some interop testing using Celtix with Indigo to > >> test the > >> WS-RM, WS-A and SOAP (1.1 only for now) interoperability. > >> Obviously, > >> until the results of those tests come in, I don't know how far > >> away we > >> are. > >> > >> -- > >> J. Daniel Kulp > >> Principal Engineer > >> IONA > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > >
