ant elder wrote:
Thats what I'll start doing then, its easy enough to move them if anyone has
a different suggestion.
If they're separate projects must they really use the
org.apache.tuscany.samples.javascript... package names or could that be
something shorter? Some of those long names are quite hard to read in the
scdl.
...ant
On 3/24/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to make some more complete samples for the JavaScript
componentType
so where should they go?
JavaScript works a bit differently from Java so I think there should be
separate samples for things like:
- basic helloworld
- properties
- service references
- a couple for E4X (if thats going)
- importing packages and classes (for SDO)
- how to do initialization when a script is loaded
- probably some others...
Are these tests or samples? Should they be in the JavaScript project or
Samples project?
I'm inclined to keep them in the JavaScript project as testcase/samples
instead of keeping on adding things to Samples.
I'd also quite like to have them coded just like a user would, using a
J2SE
client doing new TuscanyRuntime/getModuleContext/locateService, and with
an
sca.module file for each one so its obvious what SCDL is required. Thats
not
possible though if they're all in the JavaScript project as each project
can
only have the single sca.module file in the top level of the project.
That
was discussed here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
An alternative would be to have a JavaScript sub project in samples and
add
all these samples as sub projects to that.
Any comments or suggestions?
...ant
Ant, +1 from me, the more samples we have the better! I like the idea of
having a javascript sub project with samples as sub-projects, mainly
because I think it's what app developers will do: one project per SCA
module.
--
Jean-Sebastien
I've been wondering about that for the java samples as well. Currently
we have very long package names like
org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote for
example. I think it would be nicer if we could just have stockquote, or
sample.stockquote. What do people think?
--
Jean-Sebastien
