Jim Marino wrote: > I noticed in system.module we are using qualified names for system > services based on the full name of the implementation class. I'd prefer > if we continue to use the dot notation, but shorten the names, e.g.: > > org.apache.tuscany.core.loader.WSDLDefinitionRegistry > > to > > system.loader.WSDLDefinitionRegistry > > Thoughts? >
They are unwieldy but they are unique. I think we need some "namespacing" if we continue along the path of merging fragments into a single composite. This would go away if we switched to a composition model where the fragments become "part"s of the outer composition. -- Jeremy
