I was thinking we would reserve "system" for Tuscany things. This
would be unique.
Jim
On Apr 20, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
I noticed in system.module we are using qualified names for system
services based on the full name of the implementation class. I'd
prefer
if we continue to use the dot notation, but shorten the names, e.g.:
org.apache.tuscany.core.loader.WSDLDefinitionRegistry
to
system.loader.WSDLDefinitionRegistry
Thoughts?
They are unwieldy but they are unique. I think we need some
"namespacing" if we continue along the path of merging fragments
into a
single composite.
This would go away if we switched to a composition model where the
fragments become "part"s of the outer composition.
--
Jeremy
