Jean-Sebastien, Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our SVN and as part of a distribution. So +1 from me.
-- dims On 4/26/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Marino wrote: > > Just a friendly reminder to those working on the core or model to > > please include celtix in their refactorings. I accidentally forgot to > > check in my refactors (sandbox is separate) and run the checkstyle > > tests from celtix/binding.celtix resulting in Dan having a broken demo > > :-( Also, someone else modifying the loader forgot to include the > > project in their refactors (I fixed it)... > > > > Dan also proposed we adopt checkstyle as part of the build process. I > > would like to due this using lazy consensus with the caveat that the > > cut-over be done after the Java One release to avoid disruption and > > give people a chance to adjust code gradually. The checkstyle > > configuration is fairly rigorous and we will need to divide up the > > work to do so by project. > > > > Jim > > > > Sorry for contributing to the break as well... when I did my latest > refactoring I didn't have the Celtix binding included in my workspace > either. What do people think about moving the Celtix binding to the > main code stream under bindings/? It's getting in a good shape now, and > this way we'll all include it in our refactoring, testing, it'll be > loaded in our IDEs etc. > > Any thoughts? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
